users@glassfish.java.net

Re: Comparison of Open Source Application Servers

From: Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart <pelegri_at_sun.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:00:14 -0800

As John says, different people will place different value to different
differentiators.

In _addition_ to John's list, I'd also add:

* Downloads - In december we had at least 430K d/l - this was partial
due to a change in reporting machinery. As soon as I have more complete
numbers, I'll report them. This is substantially larger than JBoss (as
reported by SourceForge) and Geronimo (as reported by Apache stats).

* Velocity - We releasd GFv1 in May 06; since then we have released GFv1
UR1, GFv2 and GFv2 UR1. We are now working on GFv2.1 and GFv3 (modular)

* Up-Market - SIP Servlet support and Telco Support via SailFin

* Down-Market - Very small footprint and flexibility via modularity in GFv3.

I'm sure I'm missing differentiators...

        - eduard/o


John Clingan wrote:
> I'm not sure what your comparison criteria are. From a GlassFish
> perspective, here are the *high-level* differentiators:
>
> 1) GlassFish is the fastest open source application server.
> http://weblogs.java.net/blog/sdo/archive/2007/07/sjsas_91_glassf.html
> http://weblogs.java.net/blog/sdo/archive/2007/11/a_scalable_spec.html
>
> 2) GlassFish offers centralized management of clusters and instances
> distributed across multiple servers.
>
> 3) Outstanding documentation (we are told that this is a differentiator)
> http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/coll/1343.5
>
> 4) Microsoft .NET 3.0 web services interoperability
> https://metro.dev.java.net/
>
> 5) Java Business Integration support
> http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=208
>
> 6) Ease of use (based on community/customer feedback), much of which
> centers around the administration console and easy cluster creation and
> configuration. Just a few clicks.
>
> 7) Call flow analysis for diagnosing performance problems
> Summary description, along with other features, here:
> http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/glassfish/GFv2OpenforBusiness/
>
>
> 8) High performing message queue implementation (Open Message Queue),
> with a highly available message store.
> https://mq.dev.java.net/
>
> 9) Update center for downloading additional features, samples,
> blueprints, etc.
>
> 10) Java EE 5 reference implementation. Full Java EE 5 support a year
> (or more) ahead of the others open source appservers
>
> I'd like to work with you on updating the following chart as you learn
> more.
> http://wiki.glassfish.java.net/Wiki.jsp?page=GlassFishVsTomcat
>
> Feel free to contact me directly for any questions you may have about
> GlassFish
> John dot Clingan at Sun dot COM
>
> glassfish_at_javadesktop.org wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We need to compare the open source Application Servers - JBoss, Apache
>> Geronimo and Glassfish based on features as well as on performance.
>>
>> If anyone has done such a comparison, please share your knowledge with
>> us.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Yogesh
>> [Message sent by forum member 'yogeshkumararora' (yogeshkumararora)]
>>
>> http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=256827
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>
>