Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart wrote:
> Hi Gustav3d -- We would very much welcome Terracotta working with us to
> integrate into GlassFish. We had an early proof of concept a while ago,
> for JavaOne but we have been busy on both sides since then. Please let
> your contacts at Terracotta know of your interest and we will work on
> our side to do the same.
The fix is quite simple and I already talked to them :-) I guess they
worried about to have two implementations to maintains because we forked
from Tomcat (but our Valve implementation perform better, so we should
convince them this is the way to go :-)).
-- Jeanfrancois
>
> - eduard/o
>
> glassfish_at_javadesktop.org wrote:
>> hello,
>>
>> Support for terracotta. It would greatly increase current asynchron
>> session replication performance and also allow for good performing
>> synchron replication, that today is a missing feature due to
>> performance problems..
>>
>>
>> Terracotta in GF is currently stopped by the fact that GF relies on a
>> custom branch of tomcat that does not allow for terracotta to hook
>> itself in.ยจ:
>> http://www.terracotta.org/confluence/display/docs1/Integrations+Glassfish
>>
>> Perhaps by using terracotta , or at least allowing it to plug in could
>> allow for good synchronized replication performce in V2.1 or V3 ?
>>
>> regards
>> gustav trede
>> [Message sent by forum member 'gustav3d' (gustav3d)]
>>
>> http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=244459
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>