glassfish_at_javadesktop.org wrote:
>> Having said that , your application is *not* portable
>> if you rely on
>> this behavior. A portable and better approach is to
>> use library jar
>> option or bundled optional package mechanism.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sahoo
>>
>
> Could you elaborate on what you mean exactly? It's important that my application is portable, so I'd like to find a better approach.
>
> Marius
>
You will find the sections of the spec that I mentioned in my previous
email a better alternative than what I can write here. Since you are
really interested in portability of your application, I suggest you take
a look at the spec.
Thanks,
Sahoo