> Having said that , your application is *not* portable
> if you rely on
> this behavior. A portable and better approach is to
> use library jar
> option or bundled optional package mechanism.
>
> Thanks,
> Sahoo
Could you elaborate on what you mean exactly? It's important that my application is portable, so I'd like to find a better approach.
Marius
[Message sent by forum member 'mariusw' (mariusw)]
http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=239861