users@glassfish.java.net

Re: Absent Code attribute in method that is not native or abstract!

From: Sahoo <Sahoo_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 01:26:05 +0530

glassfish_at_javadesktop.org wrote:
> There is a difference between <scope>provided</scope> when talking about transitive dependencies and when talking about classpaths.
>
> When dealing with transitive dependencies, it remains as provided. So anything that depends on an artifact that depends on the javaee artifact will not pull the javaee into it's classpath.
>
> For compiling, the javaee.jar will be on the classpath with scope provided.
>
> The test classpath = all the <scope>test</scope> artifacts; followed by the compile classpath.
>
> Thus, the javaee.jar is on the test classpath... therefore the unit tests will fail if they reference any of the borked classes as they cannot be classloaded.
>
>
What you are saying sounds different from what is mentioned hare:
http://docs.codehaus.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=26408

Thanks,
Sahoo