quality@glassfish.java.net

Re: Some Criticism On The Modularization

From: Miroslav Nachev <miro_at_space-comm.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 16:52:24 +0300

Hi,

I have one idea regarding of GF v3 management. The management to be done
using NetBeans as platform for standalone or JWS (JNLP) application and
NetBeans plugin which to be integrated in NetBeans 6.5+. This management to
be not only for GF but for all JSR-277/JSR-291(OSGi) bundles. The transport
unit between the OSGi framework and Management Application to be named
Control Unit. This control unit to describe everything for the node tree and
to provide the possible actions which can be done from that tree node.
So, each bundle can provide such information or can be installed additional
bundle which to provide Control Units for one or more bundles.


Regards,
Miro.


On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Adam Bien <abien_at_adam-bien.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> The modularization of GF v3 is great for the qualitity of the architecture
> and minimalization of footprint.
> It makes, however, the installation lot harder. For the end-user, it should
> come with similar experience as GF v2.
> Right now e.g. the admin-console has to be installed afterwards, although
> it is mostly needed. GF v3 should come with pre-installed profiles, the
> installation should be even easier, than the installation of GF v2... In
> best case, just download and start...
>
> I filed an enhancement regarding this issue:
> https://glassfish.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5679,
>
> regards,
>
> adam
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: quality-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: quality-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>
>