Hi,
There are regressions in the 9.0 UR1 builds in comparision to the 9.0
results. The additional failures are due to the change in the below
listed toplink changes which required testcase fixes.
- Join of embedded entities should be disallowed
- A check has been added to em.remove() that throws
IllegalArgumentException
After fixing the testcases, there are now passing.
Thanks,
Sailaja
Ming Zhang wrote:
> Sudipa,
>
> Compared with 9.0 results, we are seeing more failures on 9.0UR1. I
> guess some of the failures can be attributed to the merge done
> recently for the persistence module from the trunk (9.1) to the 9.0
> UR1 branch. Sailaja is working on the failure analysis and she will
> update Table 2 with detailed info when she is done.
>
> Thanks,
> Ming
>
> Sudipa Bhattacharya wrote:
>
>> Ming,
>> Thanks for sharing this .
>> How about the result set on 9.0 ?
>> Are the test failures matching the results on 9.0 or do u see any
>> regression here ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sudipa
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Ming Zhang <Ming.Zhang_at_Sun.COM>
>> Date: Friday, September 22, 2006 5:03 pm
>> Subject: DB testing for Glassfish 9.0UR1
>> To: quality <quality_at_glassfish.dev.java.net>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The DB testing for glassfish 9.0UR1 was performed by following the
>>> DB and DB driver matrix shown in Table 1. The results against MySQL,
>>> MSSQL 2005, Sybase, DB2, PostgreSQL are outlined in Table 2.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Ming
>>>
>>>
>>