Sudipa,
Compared with 9.0 results, we are seeing more failures on 9.0UR1. I
guess some of the failures can be attributed to the merge done recently
for the persistence module from the trunk (9.1) to the 9.0 UR1 branch.
Sailaja is working on the failure analysis and she will update Table 2
with detailed info when she is done.
Thanks,
Ming
Sudipa Bhattacharya wrote:
>Ming,
>
>Thanks for sharing this .
>How about the result set on 9.0 ?
>Are the test failures matching the results on 9.0 or do u see any regression here ?
>
>Thanks,
>Sudipa
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Ming Zhang <Ming.Zhang_at_Sun.COM>
>Date: Friday, September 22, 2006 5:03 pm
>Subject: DB testing for Glassfish 9.0UR1
>To: quality <quality_at_glassfish.dev.java.net>
>
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>The DB testing for glassfish 9.0UR1 was performed by following the
>>DB
>>and DB driver matrix shown in Table 1. The results against MySQL,
>>MSSQL
>>2005, Sybase, DB2, PostgreSQL are outlined in Table 2.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Ming
>>
>>
>>