hi Wouter,
sounds very much like what i need. i'll take a look into it.
thanks a lot!
./allan
Wouter van Reeven wrote:
> Hi Allan,
>
>
> I'd say you need to create one EJB module and two WEB modules in NetBeans. The
> EJB module would need a persistence.xml and the two WEB modules will need to
> lookup local session beans from the EJB module to fetch their data. In that
> way, only one module is responsible for the database connection (i.e. the EJB
> module) and both WEB modules share the same Entities and Entity cache.
>
> Is that what you're after?
>
>
> HTH, Wouter van Reeven
>
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 09:05:41AM +0200, Allan Juul wrote:
>> hi
>>
>> [first post here]
>>
>> is the following scenario possible ?
>>
>> In my GF webContainer i have two web applications:
>>
>> /webappWriter
>>
>> /webappReader
>>
>>
>> these two web apps should access data from the same datasource (mysql
>> db) and therefore (hopefully) share the same entity classes.
>>
>> so these entity classes will be in some "shared" og "common" namespaced
>> library.
>>
>>
>> if I create separate identical Entityclasses it seems to work ok, but if
>> i factor these out to my common library i get a
>>
>> ****
>> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Object:
>> my.name.space.common.Item[id=1244876498959]
>> is not a known entity type
>> ****
>>
>>
>> i imagine i have a persitence.xml issue - because the "common" library
>> need its own persitence.xml (at least in netbeans) and so does the
>> respective webapps. so which one wins?
>>
>>
>> anyway, any pointers much appreciated
>>
>> ./allan
>