persistence@glassfish.java.net

Re: Constructor Expressions

From: Marina Vatkina <Marina.Vatkina_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 12:44:53 -0800

Are you using TopLink Essentials? Enable SQL logging (i.e. FINE logging level)
and you'll see the actual SQL sent to the database.

Regards,
-marina

Dru Devore wrote:
> I am working on recreating the problem but I think I might have solved
> it. I trying to use sql in the creation. I have since tried to do it
> using the object references JPQL which is proving to be difficult
> because I am using a fairly hard query. It links 4 tables conditionally
> with the resulting object being a conglomerate of the 4.
>
> two questions.
>
> 1. is there a way to make a query for this using a native query?
>
> 2. if I use JPQL will it create the standard sql and execute it or will
> it do the query using the objects and simply create the resulting object
> from the objects. I am concerned about memory. This query will return
> 25,000 objects and with the four tables linked in code it will bring my
> server to its knees....
>
> ---
> Dru Devore
> The best Christian community now online.
> The Faith Haven
> www.thefaithhaven.com
> Come join us, bookmark us, and enjoy!
>
>
>>-------- Original Message --------
>>Subject: Re: Constructor Expressions
>>From: Wouter van Reeven <wouter_at_van.reeven.nl>
>>Date: Thu, November 06, 2008 2:04 pm
>>To: persistence_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>
>>
>>On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 12:02:36PM -0700, Dru Devore wrote:
>>
>>>I have been trying to get a constructor expression working and have had
>>>nothing but errors.
>>>
>>>I have followed an example from a book and have tried this blog
>>>
>>>http://weblogs.java.net/blog/mb124283/archive/2007/04/java_persistenc.html
>>>
>>>But I have had no luck. Any suggestions/examples out there that work?
>>
>>Can you post the expression that fails and possibly the error you get?
>>
>>
>>Thanks, Wouter van Reeven
>>
>>--
>>
>>People: "If she weighs the same as a Duck, she's made of wood!"
>>Sir Bedevere: "And therefore...?"
>
>