persistence@glassfish.java.net

RE: help me with EJB3!

From: Gordon Yorke <gordon.yorke_at_oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:23:26 -0500

Hello Sailaja,
        The solution to this issue is currently in progress. In the meantime the error you are seeing should only occur when there is a composite PK on both sides of the relationship.
        --Gordon

-----Original Message-----
From: Sailaja Rao [mailto:Sailaja.Rao_at_Sun.COM]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 2:39 PM
To: persistence_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
Subject: Re: help me with EJB3!


Hi,

https://glassfish.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53

I have a test with composite Primary keys in relationship (1-1, 1-M,
M-1 and M-M) and it fails with the following exception

Thread-4848;|[TopLink Severe]: 2005.09.21
01:11:55.406--ServerSession(3656671)--Thread(Thread[SelectorThread-4848,5,main])--Local

Exception Stack:
Exception [TOPLINK-0] (Oracle TopLink - 10g release 2 (10.1.3.0.0)
(Build 050902Dev)): oracle.toplink.exceptions.IntegrityException
Descriptor Exceptions:
---------------------------------------------------------
Runtime Exceptions:
---------------------------------------------------------
java.util.NoSuchElementException: Hashtable Enumerator

And also, I see the following exception in the same log

java.util.NoSuchElementException: Hashtable Enumerator
    at java.util.Hashtable$Enumerator.nextElement(Hashtable.java:1010)

Thanks,
Sailaja

Gordon Yorke wrote:

>The advanced model in the entity-persistence-tests GlassFish module contains a PhoneNumber class that uses a composite PrimaryKey. The package is oracle.toplink.essentials.testing.models.advanced;
>If you do not have access to the cvs modules send me an email directly and I will jar the source and send it to you.
>--Gordon
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: aung zay [mailto:aungzay0_at_gmail.com]
>Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 7:42 AM
>To: persistence_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>Subject: help me with EJB3!
>
>
>Hi,
> Any of you having entity-persistence example of
>one-to-many/many-to-one with composite key ?
>Thanks in advance.
>-AZ-
>
>
>