Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think if there are some properties that we know that many or most of
> persistence providers are likely to need, then we should try to name
> them in some consistent way. Like what DataSource does. For example,
> what about
>
> javax.persistence.connection.User
> javax.persistence.connection.Password
> javax.persistence.connection.Port
> javax.persistence.connection.Host
> javax.persistence.connection.URL
>
> or whatever seems to be common connection properties.
Then they should be part of the spec...No? Now? Too late?
Ludo