GlassFish is open source and free for redistribution.
Sun does have an OEM business and we would love to give you a pointer to
them. The OEM business provides additional services like
customizations, and, of course, support and sustaining releases.
Joey Jarosz wrote:
> I guess I am looking at things more from a “delivery date” perspective
> than a “developer” perspective. I need to ship something as part of one
> of our client/server (both parts run by the customer companies) in the
> next few months. My needs are actually pretty simple (static web pages,
> servlets, JSP, JSF).
>
>
>
> I am trying to avoid going with something like Jetty and management is
> against anything that requires an OEM license or royalties. So, am just
> trying to wrap my head around embedded-glassfish so I can move forward
> with it rather than the other possibilities.
>
>
>
> joey
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:* Byron.Nevins_at_Sun.COM [mailto:Byron.Nevins_at_Sun.COM]
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:56 PM
> *To:* embedded_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> *Subject:* Re: [embedded] Re: Feedback Wanted: Embedded APIs for GFv3
> Prelude
>
>
>
> Joey,
>
> We decided to birth embedded in a static stable GlassFish environment.
> We branched off of the GlassFish Prelude build. In the near future we
> will bring all the embedded code back into the "trunk" which is the main
> code development line for GlassFish V3.
>
>
>
> Joey Jarosz wrote:
>
> I will be the first to admit that I have yet to figure out all the
> different glassfish related projects. What do you mean by the “glassfish
> trunk”; how does that related to the Embedded Glassfish project?
>
>
>
> Joey
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:* Rajiv Mordani [mailto:rajiv.mordani_at_sun.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 05, 2009 12:00 PM
> *To:* embedded_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> <mailto:embedded_at_glassfish.dev.java.net>
> *Subject:* Re: [embedded] Re: Feedback Wanted: Embedded APIs for GFv3
> Prelude
>
>
>
> Hi Joey,
> We are working on providing the ability to add multiple listeners,
> SSL config etc in the glassfish trunk. For details look at
>
> http://fisheye4.atlassian.com/browse/glassfish-svn/trunk/v3/web/web-embed/api/src/main/java/org/glassfish/web/embed
>
> This is work in progress, so it would be good to get your input if it
> meets your needs or if you would like to see any changes.
>
> Thanks
>
> - Rajiv
>
> Joey Jarosz wrote:
>
> Sorry for not being more involved – got blind sided by management and am
> now just starting to crawl out of from under.
>
>
>
> I agree, that EmbeddedInfo needs to be more complete. My original
> impression when I started looking at Embedded Glassfish was that it
> would allow me to completely define a configuration via the API – so I
> would not need static configuration files.
>
>
>
> Besides multiple listeners per server, I also need to configure SSL for
> one of my listeners.
>
>
>
> Right now, I hack it all by a combination of modified the text of a
> template domain.xml file and the Embedded API that does exist.
>
>
>
> joey
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:* Nazrul.Islam_at_Sun.COM <mailto:Nazrul.Islam_at_Sun.COM>
> [mailto:Nazrul.Islam_at_Sun.COM]
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 05, 2009 11:42 AM
> *To:* Jerome Dochez
> *Cc:* embedded_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> <mailto:embedded_at_glassfish.dev.java.net>; Anil Gaur
> *Subject:* [embedded] Re: Feedback Wanted: Embedded APIs for GFv3 Prelude
>
>
>
> Thanks for the feedbacks.
>
> Jerome Dochez wrote:
>
> EmbeddedInfo is not generic enough, it asks for http ports but what
> about if you need to add more listener, or even what about if you don't
> want to open any port (like an embedded EJB Container).
>
> I think the intent was to make it simple for typical use cases. People
> can use CommandExecutor for more complicated configuration changes.
>
>
>
> We need one consistent way of defining 0 to many http listeners and ports.
>
>
>
> Do you have a proposal for EmbeddedInfo? We can adjust it.
>
>
>
> EmbeddedDeployer is also not generic enough, the scatteredWar concept
> needs to be extended to an ScatteredArchive concept (which would map to
> jar, war, rar and maybe even ear) and the deployScattered() methods need
> to use that ScatteredArchive as a parameter. In fact, I am not sure why
> we need a deployScattered() method all together, I think deploy() should
> be enough and we should be smart enough to figure out what was passed to us.
>
> Agreed. We should use ScatteredArchive and deploy method if possible.
>
>
>
>
>
> EmbeddedMain talks about using the uber jar, it should in fact be moved
> into the glassfish.jar so that people can do the same thing using a
> normal distribution (as they can already do today for most of the
> features of that class, today I can do java -jar glassfish.jar foo.war).
>
> There is no glassfish.jar in this case. Are you asking for supporting
> "java -jar glassfish.jar foo.war" use case also? Please note that for
> Prelude, we are not supporting the implanted use case yet. When we
> support "implanted" we can certainly use glassfish.jar.
>
>
>
>
>
> Server : why do we return the cataline Engine object ? I suppose this
> would be removed once we integrate the new web container embedded APIs,
> right ? If that's the case, we should not have here.
>
>
>
> This is a bug. Byron/Jennifer: Could you please remove this?
>
>
>
> So as a conclusion, this APIs is very targeted to war file deployment,
> and we cannot hope to be able to extend it to support full V3 styles of
> deployment and maintain backward compatibility.
>
>
>
> Either we spend the time to make it right for embedded release or we
> declare it as a non stable (with knowledge that it will extensively
> change for v3 release).
>
> Lets see what can be done. This is not throw away work.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Nazrul Islam - (408) 276-6468 - Sun Microsystems, Inc.
>
>> Jerome
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mar 4, 2009, at 12:04 PM, Nazrul Islam wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> We are planning to wrap-up the development activities for GFv3 Prelude
>> and move to GFv3 trunk. We would like your feedbacks on the current
>> APIs
>> <https://embedded-glassfish.dev.java.net/nonav/gf-embedded-api/apidocs/>.
>>
>> _Background on Current APIs_:
>> The APIs has gone through several iterations already. Thanks for
>> filing all the issues
>> <https://embedded-glassfish.dev.java.net/issues/buglist.cgi?Submit+query=Submit+query&issue_type=DEFECT&issue_type=ENHANCEMENT&issue_type=FEATURE&issue_type=TASK&issue_type=PATCH&component=embedded-glassfish&subcomponent=API&issue_status=RESOLVED&issue_status=VERIFIED&issue_status=CLOSED&version=current&email1=&emailtype1=exact&emailassigned_to1=1&email2=&emailtype2=exact&emailreporter2=1&issueidtype=include&issue_id=&changedin=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&short_desc=&short_desc_type=fulltext&long_desc=&long_desc_type=fulltext&issue_file_loc=&issue_file_loc_type=fulltext&status_whiteboard=&status_whiteboard_type=fulltext&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=&cmdtype=doit&order=Issue+Number>.
>> The APIs has been reviewed internally also few times lately ([1
>> <https://embedded-glassfish.dev.java.net/issues/buglist.cgi?Submit+query=Submit+query&issue_type=DEFECT&issue_type=ENHANCEMENT&issue_type=FEATURE&issue_type=TASK&issue_type=PATCH&component=embedded-glassfish&subcomponent=API&issue_status=RESOLVED&issue_status=VERIFIED&issue_status=CLOSED&version=current&email1=&emailtype1=exact&emailassigned_to1=1&email2=ai109478&emailtype2=exact&emailreporter2=1&issueidtype=include&issue_id=&changedin=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&short_desc=&short_desc_type=fulltext&long_desc=&long_desc_type=fulltext&issue_file_loc=&issue_file_loc_type=fulltext&status_whiteboard=&status_whiteboard_type=fulltext&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=&cmdtype=doit&order=Issue+Number>],
>> [2
>> <https://embedded-glassfish.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67>],
>> [3
>> <https://embedded-glassfish.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86>])
>> and is scheduled for a formal review at GlassFish architecture forum
>> on 3/16. Since we will be doing the webtier APIs on the trunk, for
>> GFv3 Prelude we focused on basics first such as start/stop,
>> configuration management, etc. Refer to attached presentation for a
>> brief overview of the APIs.
>>
>> Jerome: You mentioned that you may have some feedback. Please let us
>> know.
>>
>> Thanks much.
>>
>> _References_:
>> Javadocs:
>> https://embedded-glassfish.dev.java.net/nonav/gf-embedded-api/apidocs/
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Nazrul Islam - (408) 276-6468 - Sun Microsystems, Inc.
>>
>>
>> <Embedded_GlassFish_API.odp>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To
> unsubscribe, e-mail: embedded-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> <mailto:embedded-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net> For additional
> commands, e-mail: embedded-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> <mailto:embedded-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Byron Nevins Work 408-276-4089, Home 650-359-1290, Cell 650-784-4123 - Sun Microsystems, Inc.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To
> unsubscribe, e-mail: embedded-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net For
> additional commands, e-mail: embedded-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net