Hi,
After some discussion in our meeting, we decided to go back to the
original maven-glassfish-plugin that sits outside the embedded project.
When the plugin was moved under the embedded project, we saw some issues
with the classpath not getting set properly.
Please continue to use maven-glassfish-plugin and mvn glassfish:run.
http://maven.dyndns.org/glassfish/org/glassfish/maven-glassfish-plugin/
<plugin>
<groupId>org.glassfish</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-glassfish-plugin</artifactId>
</plugin>
Sorry for any inconvenience.
Jennifer
Greg Luck wrote:
> Hi
>
> I think, given the naming conflict I highlighted
> in http://gregluck.com/blog/archives/2008/11/mvn_glassfishru.html,
> this is a good name.
>
> My suggestion was maven-glassfish-embedded-plugin,
> which you would use with mvn glassfish-embedded:run. mvn gfe:run
>
> Regards
>
> *Greg Luck*
> Chief Architect
> web: http://www.wotif.com
> skype: gregrluck
> yahoo: gregrluck
> mobile: +61 408 061 622
> *
> *
> *Wotif.com* - First in online accommodation
>
> Subscribe to our newsletter:
> http://www.wotif.com/Newsletter.jsp
>
>
> On 22/01/2009, at 8:12 AM, Byron Nevins wrote:
>
>> I am moving the "glassfish:run" plugin to under the GFE code umbrella.
>> This will make life easier and better.
>>
>> I am provisionally changing the name of the plugin from
>> maven-glassfish-plugin to mvn-gfe-plugin
>>
>> This means that the easiest way to use it would be like so:
>>
>> mvn gfe:run
>>
>> --------
>>
>> Do you have any ideas or opinions on a better nam? If so please join
>> the thread!
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Byron Nevins Work 408-276-4089, Home 650-359-1290, Cell 650-784-4123
>> - Sun Microsystems, Inc.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> dev-unsubscribe_at_embedded-glassfish.dev.java.net
>> <mailto:dev-unsubscribe_at_embedded-glassfish.dev.java.net>
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> dev-help_at_embedded-glassfish.dev.java.net
>> <mailto:dev-help_at_embedded-glassfish.dev.java.net>
>>
>