On Thursday 09 August 2012 09:14 AM, Tang Yong wrote:
> Dear Sahoo,
>
> I have noticed that main/repo-import/glassfish-obr-builder module
> seemed to integrate obr, right?
>
> If yes, I have the following problems,
>
> 1) status of the module
> Is the moudle ready to implement OSGi RFC-0112 Bundle Repository?
> If yes, why not integration Apache Felix OSGi Bundle Repository?
This is a dead module. We should remove it.
> 2) mean of GF OBR Integration
> From https://wikis.oracle.com/display/GlassFish/3.1OSGi, having the
> following goal,
>
> "
> OBR integration: We plan to have OBR integration in place so that
> GlassFish deployment process can resolve dependencies of bundles via
> OBR. OBR integration will also help us having a better provisioning
> story for embedded glassfish use case, for we can then provide a la
> carte access to GF modules via OBR.
> "
>
> About the above goal, I considered the following use cases:
>
> $B-!(B GlassFish-Self modules's provisioning
> For a user, he/she maybe only use a few function of glassfish/modules,
> by using obr, glassfish's installation may be more "thiner", that is to
> say, user needs not to install some modules which he/she is not ready to
> use firstly in order to save the resouces.
This is a work in progress. I have implemented this to some extent in
trunk. I call this "on demand" mode. You can try it out by setting
glassfish.osgi.ondemand=true in glassfish/config/osgi.properties.
> $B-"(B Glassfish-Outside modles's provisioning
> Liking apache ace and karaf, by using obr, will give user more strenth
> to deploy a big app, and I will spend some time to investigate it.
>
Yes, this is where we have to bring in OBR. This is the use case the
Wiki page refers to as well.
> So, what I said is right?
Very much.
Thanks,
Sahoo
> --Best Regard!
> --Tang
>
>
>