Given that the config beans for modules under appserver have been moved
to the the modules that actually use the config beans, should we expect
that the same pattern would be followed within nucleus, i.e., if there
is a Virtualization config bean, then that config bean should be under a
virtualization module rather than under admin/config-api?
Tom
On 9/1/2011 6:44 PM, Carla Mott wrote:
> Just noticed that this change introduces a cyclic reference. Need to
> clean that up.
>
> On 9/1/11 4:39 PM, Carla Mott wrote:
>>
>> Please review: I added a dependency in pom.xml under admin/config-api
>>
>> <version>${project.parent.version}</version>
>> </dependency>
>> <dependency>
>> + <groupId>org.glassfish.virtualization</groupId>
>> + <artifactId>libvirt</artifactId>
>> + <version>${project.parent.version}</version>
>> + </dependency>
>> + <dependency>
>> <groupId>org.glassfish.common</groupId>
>> <artifactId>glassfish-api</artifactId>
>> <version>${project.parent.version}</version>
>