dev@glassfish.java.net

Re: java.* - import first or last?

From: Byron Nevins <byron.nevins_at_oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 00:34:40 -0800

I'm with Sahoo on this one. The specifics come first. The other way
around makes no sense to me. My analogy would be catching Exception
AFTER catching RuntimeException (in which case you HAVE to do the more
specific first).



On 12/8/2010 10:29 PM, Sahoo wrote:
> One can't import p1.C and p2.C at the same time. If one imports p1.*
> and p2.C, then p2.C always wins irrespective of the order. So, what's
> the real issue?
>
> I am one of those who import java.* at the end, because I like to see
> non-standard dependencies ahead of standard ones. I may not have done
> that consistently though.
>
> Sahoo
>
> On Thursday 09 December 2010 11:43 AM, Bill Shannon wrote:
>> I always include imports of java.* classes first. If there's any
>> sort of
>> naming conflict, I want the standard classes, not the product-specific
>> classes of the same name. If I see "List", I really don't want to
>> wonder
>> whether it's java.util.List or some other List.
>>
>> But I see a bunch of code that imports the java.* classes last.
>>
>> Why?
>

-- 
Byron Nevins  -  Oracle Corporation
Home: 650-359-1290
Cell: 650-784-4123
Sierra: 209-295-2188