dev@glassfish.java.net

Re: Export-Package and the mandatory-directive

From: Richard S. Hall <heavy_at_ungoverned.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:38:24 -0400

On 10/26/10 15:36, Richard S. Hall wrote:
> On 10/26/10 13:57, Sheetal Vartak wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to add the following constraint in the jsf-api.jar :
>>
>> Export-Package: javax.faces.*;version=2.0,\
>> com.sun.faces.application.view.StateHolderSaver;version=2.0;password="com.sun.faces.application.view";mandatory:=password
>>
>
> Are you really specifying "javax.faces.*" ? If so, wildcards are not
> allowed in the Export-Package header. You must specify exported
> packages explicitly. You can use wildcards with BND to expand exported
> files.

Sorry, it dawns on me that this must be in the osgi.bundle file, given
the line continuation character...

>
> -> richard
>
>>
>> My jsf-impl.jar has the following :
>>
>> Import-Package:
>> ......
>> com.sun.faces.application.view.StateHolderSaver;version=2.0;password="com.sun.faces.application.view",
>> \
>> ......
>>
>> Now when I drop these 2 jars in the v3.1 workspace and try to start
>> the server, I see the following error message in server.log :
>>
>> [#|2010-10-25T16:12:04.901-0700|SEVERE|glassfish3.1|null|_ThreadID=16;_ThreadName=Thread-1;|Caused
>> by: org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in
>> bundle org.glassfish.web.weld-integration [20]: Unable to resolve
>> 20.0: missing requirement [20.0] package;
>> (&(package=com.sun.faces.spi)(version>=2.0.0)) [caused by: Unable to
>> resolve 50.0: missing requirement [50.0] package;
>> (&(package=com.sun.faces.application.view.StateHolderSaver)(password=com.sun.faces.application.view)(version>=2.0.0))]|#]
>>
>>
>> I checked the Manifest.MF of weld-integration.jar. It has an
>> Import-Package attr specifying "com.sun.faces.spi" as one of them. As
>> you can see above, the mandatory-directive is only for
>> com.sun.faces.application.view.StateHolderSaver. Then what am I
>> missing here?
>>
>> Does weld-integration.jar's Manifest.MF somehow need the
>> mandatory-directive to be specified? And why?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sheetal
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>