Mahesh Kannan wrote:
> The problem with keepState=web,ejb is:
> 1. Why would a user want to retain just web state and not ejb state
> (or vice versa) in his application?
I do not know why someone would want to do that... but as soon as we
make it impossible, someone will request it and have a simple and clear
reason for their request.
> 2. If ejb container is NOT ha enabled, what will be the effect of
> specifying --keepState=web,ejb ?
That is a tough question... but I am not sure that I follow you... Are
you saying that 3.1 will ship with an ejb container that doesn't support
HA?
>
> I prefer to say --keepState=true and let each container to retain
> whatever "state" means to them.
>
> --Mahesh
>