Hi Jerome,
I tried to add @RunWith(Hk2Runner.class) to get a hold of the habitat in one of
my junit tests, but it failed with a lot of messages in the console output like
this:
Beginning parsing ...
Ignoring service-less ...
then it came to these lines (what is car?) and failed:
Finished introspecting hk2-core-1.0.19.jar
Finished introspecting test-classes
Finished introspecting auto-depends-1.0.19.jar
Finished introspecting osgi-adapter-1.0.19.jar
Finished introspecting annotation-framework-3.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
Finished introspecting ejb-internal-api-3.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
Starting to introspect
finished introspecting
Starting to introspect
finished introspecting
Found contract : com.sun.enterprise.connectors.ActiveResourceAdapter
--> com.sun.enterprise.connectors.ActiveResourceAdapterImpl {index:
{com.sun.enterprise.connectors.ActiveResourceAdapter,}
class: {com.sun.enterprise.connectors.ActiveResourceAdapterImpl,}
}
<...>
-->
com.sun.enterprise.deployment.annotation.introspection.AppClientPersistenceDependencyAnnotationScanner
{index: {com.sun.enterpr
ise.deployment.annotation.introspection.AnnotationScanner:car,}
class:
{com.sun.enterprise.deployment.annotation.introspection.AppClientPersistenceDependencyAnnotationScanner,}
com.sun.enterprise.deployment.annotation.introspection.AnnotationScanner: {car,}
}
-------------------------------------------------------
T E S T S
-------------------------------------------------------
Running com.sun.enterprise.transaction.jts.AppTest
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.138 sec <<<
FAILURE!
Results :
Tests in error:
com.sun.enterprise.transaction.jts.AppTest
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0
thanks,
-marina
Jerome Dochez wrote:
> I have made good progress integrating Hk2 injection inside JUnit tests
> so I have written a wiki page on how to better unit test your modules
> with JUnit and Hk2.
>
> http://wiki.glassfish.java.net/Wiki.jsp?page=TestingWithHk2
>
> Now you can use @Inject inside junit tests and have habitat services
> injected and tested. It should simplify the testing of individual
> modules, please try to use this as soon as possible for unit testing.
>
> I believe we should be able to do the same with TestNG but I have no
> cycles for that, if anyone wants to pick that up, it would be great...
>
> jerome