Sorry, I missed your e-mail. So, where is the new bean-validator source
artifact? Do you have a tag?
Currently, Javadocs is generated from the sources in svn tag:
https://glassfish-svn.dev.java.net/svn/glassfish-svn/tags/20091014-bean-validator-jsr-303-v4_0_1
Is it possible to publish the bean-validator sourcea artifact in the
Maven repository? We can generate new javadocs w/o doing a full
binary integration. However, it's too late for the v3 SDK bundle.
Jane
Ed Burns wrote:
> I sent this during break and it may have been missed, so I'm resending
> it.
>
> Jane, can you please reply?
>
>
>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 21:00:14 -0500, Ed Burns <ed.burns_at_sun.com> said:
>>>>>>
>
> EB> https://glassfish.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11378
> EB> Hi Jane,
>
> EB> I have a new BV source snapshot. The only difference between this and
> EB> the previous one is the addition of a </code> tag in the Javadocs.
> EB> Without this, the javaee6 index at
> EB> <http://java.sun.com/javaee/6/docs/api/index-all.html> looks terrible.
>
> EB> I'd like to just fix this with a new javadoc update rather than a full
> EB> binary integration to GF. Then, when the corresponding Hibernate JIRA
> EB> issue HV-280 is fixed, we can consider doing a full binary integration.
>
> To tie it in to a mail Jane sent previously:
>
>
>>>>>> On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 02:25:16 -0800, Jane Young <Jane.Young_at_Sun.COM> said:
>>>>>>
>
> JY> Thanks, Kin-man.
> JY> The latest EE 6 apis javadoc is published:
> JY> http://javadoc.glassfish.org/javaee6/apidoc/
>
> JY> Can the module owners and doc team review this and let me know if you
> JY> see anything missing.
>
> My request is closely related to Janes.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Ed
>
>