> The dates were all updated based on svn checkin date, according to
> Bill, who wrote the tool.
>
Yes, they're correct now. I'll try to be waaay more specific next time
I'm joking. You know, there are many Sun-owned Java files that aren't
in GlassFish.
> There is no reason a file can't have existed in 2009 without being
> changed.
Of course not. But there were many many files *created* in 2009 where
someone copied in a copyright with something like 1997-2006 included.
I was only referring to the idea that a lot of files don't (or didn't)
have the correct information in them.
Cheers,
Bobby