Okay, thanks for letting me know.
Snjezana Sevo-Zenzerovic wrote:
> Jane,
>
> those servlet-api/jstl-api dependencies were commented for a similar
> reason, we were running into stack overflow error during dependency
> graph resolution and the workaround was to exclude them using ant
> tasks instead of direct pom dependency exclusion. I would leave them
> as-is for the time being and I'll take another look when I have more
> time.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Snjezana
>
>
> Jane Young wrote:
>> Hi Ryan,
>>
>> Thanks for updating the Copyright dates to 2010.
>> I reviewed the pom files and have one question (maybe the question is
>> for Snjezana). In packager/glassfish-web/pom.xml, the artifacts
>> servlet-api and jstl-api are commented. Is there a reason for doing
>> this? It's was also previously commented. Can we remove it?
>> The rest of the pom file changes look fine.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jane
>>
>>
>>
>> Ryan Lubke wrote:
>>> Hi Jane, Snjezana,
>>>
>>> I've had to add/duplicate a small set of exclusions to several of
>>> the pom.xml files in the packager section of the tree.
>>> This was necessary in order to integrate a new version of Grizzly
>>> without the antrun-extended pluging to bottom out
>>> with a StackoverFlowError.
>>>
>>> Could you please give your blessing on these changes?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -rl
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>