Siraj Ghaffar wrote:
> There are some interfaces in that package - however I see your point
> in not publishing javadocs for packages that are unlikely to be used
> by end users. That makes sense. One interface in that package that
> might be useful for those using the embedded APIs would be the
> CommandRunner interface that allows you to run administrative commands.
>
> Rajiv Mordani wrote:
>> Siraj, Jane,
>> We want to publish javadocs for the APIs that developers can use,
>> not the implementation classes. If there are some packages from admin
>> that are useful for end users / developers that are not being
>> published let me know. However some things that I see in the admin
>> modules didn't seem to make sense for end users (at least that's what
>> I think) so I did not include it.
>>
>> - Rajiv
In fact, we should only publish doc for the exported public packages
that have been declared as such in the ARC cases, right?
Ludo