>>>>> On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:28:46 -0700, Lloyd Chambers <Lloyd.Chambers_at_Sun.COM> said:
LC> I scan the server log after a QL run as not everything shows up as a
LC> QL failure. This stuff makes that a tedious affair. Is it *needed*
LC> for some reason?
The problem Lloyd is pointing out has real consequences that can cause
wasted time in fixing QL failures. Sahoo, can you also chime in on this
issue of the ability to discover from QL output if there is a failure or
not?
Ed
--
| ed.burns_at_sun.com | office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640
| homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/