vince kraemer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am going to vote -0.5.... not -1... on these, since my concerns are
> not so much technical as they are timing based....
>
> Both of these changes are pretty 'late in the game' for v3.
>
> Since both have worked this way for a significant amount of time, I
> would expect to see feedback from unhappy users about one or both of
> these issues.
>
> What are the issues that these changes would resolve?
It's just polish. Now that we see all these commands together, we're
reevaluating some earlier decisions.
> If there isn't significant feedback from users that these are critical
> to the success of Java EE 6 and GlassFish v3, then I would say we should
> defer on these.
That's part of the reason we're *not* proposing changes.
But if we don't change them now, we probably never will.