On 05/05/09 12:19, Kedar Mhaswade wrote:
>
>
> June.Parks_at_Sun.COM wrote:
>> A network listener is not exactly equivalent to an HTTP listener. It
>> is a new generalized listener of which an HTTP listener is one type.
>> It's kind of like changing "Land Rover" to "SUV."
>
> Yeah it's that way, with the caveat that if you insist on getting a
> Land Rover,
> you have to say I want an SUV with type="Land Rover" :-P
>
> BTW, I did not know that we are changing create-virtual-server
> command. It can
> ALWAYS take --httplisteners and internally, the configuration created
> is that
> for a network-listener. Can someone tell me why we are changing that
> option
> name (for one, it is not compatible).
I thought we were adding --networklisteners and keeping --httplisteners.
June
>
> -Kedar
>
>>
>> June
>>
>> On 05/04/09 09:00, Paul Davies wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I think I can answer one point:
>>>> Again, please point me to the information and I'll put it in. If a
>>>> network listener is the same as an HTTP listener, I can copy that
>>>> info, but I need some assurance that that is the case, such as a
>>>> spec or other source.
>>>
>>> According to GlassFish Issue 8147
>>> <https://glassfish.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8147>, the
>>> --httplisteners option of the create-virtual-server command is now
>>> --networklisteners, which suggests that a network listener might be
>>> the same as an HTTP listener.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> --
>>> Paul Davies, Senior Technical Writer, Sun Microsystems, Inc.
>>> http://blogs.sun.com/techscribe/
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>