On Apr 28, 2009, at 1:41 PM, Snjezana Sevo-Zenzerovic wrote:
> Jerome Dochez wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 28, 2009, at 1:10 PM, Snjezana Sevo-Zenzerovic wrote:
>>
>>> Jerome Dochez wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [WARNING] Ignoring project type distribution-fragment -
>>>>> supportedProjectTypes = [hk2-jar, bundle]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> looks like an left over from last integration from Snezana, We
>>>> moved away from distribution fragments all together, it's
>>>> probably not causing a bug, but we need to fix that.
>>>
>>>
>>> I beg to differ - we did not completely move away from
>>> distribution fragments since many modules still package their non-
>>> jar artifacts as distribution fragments which then get consumed
>>> by packager. In any case, I'll keep an eye for these in my next
>>> build and try to figure out where they come from...
>>
>> how different is the handling from a plain zip file now ?
>
> Package staging procedure explicitly looks for dependencies of
> distributions-fragment type which then get unzipped. relative to top
> level installation directory. At this point we do not make the
> assumption that any zip artifact is in fact distribution fragment.
that's what I thought so is keeping distribution fragment a real
advantage here ? everyone knows what a zip is...
jerome
>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>