On Feb 8, 2008, at 12:01 PM, Kedar Mhaswade wrote:
>
>
> Jerome Dochez wrote:
>> On Feb 8, 2008, at 9:56 AM, Kedar Mhaswade wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Jerome Dochez wrote:
>>>> are you changing any Config objects ? up to now, the domain tree
>>>> was unchanged when deploying, has this changed ?
>>>
>>> This is a good time to decide what we should do here. My feeling is
>>> that since config access has been improved in V3, we should have
>>> an app/module entry created in domain.xml during deployment
>>> and removed during undeployment.
>>>
>>> This also facilitates the target based deployment/undeployment.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>> yes but not today, we need to have admin/deployment/containers in
>> sync to do that successfully....
> admin/deployment -- yes. Frankly, the admin adaptor that deals with
> (un)deployment (and all management) requests should call deployment
> code, which
> does not do anything with config (as in domain.xml), gets the status
> that
> deployment was successful or not and then modify the config
> (domain.xml)
> accordingly.
>
> So, I think this is really an admin/config issue and has nothing to do
> with containers. Am I missing something?
but how would the generic admin adapter know what config objects need
to be added/changed/removed ?
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>