Every remote asadmin command uses adminapp, AFAIK.
I am still trying to understand the point in deferring
administration when one "starts" the domain/server.
It is a different thing whether it is the minimal admin
support that bootstraps other things as needed. But a
basic admin support is needed.
Gustav Trede -- can you tell us why you think otherwise?
Kedar
Binod wrote:
> Lloyd L Chambers wrote:
>
>> Until time and memory are measured, terms like "bloating" ought not
>> to be used; it's best to measure and state facts rather than use
>> subjective FUD terms.
>> Gustav, have you any hard numbers? I'm not sure how that would be
>> possible, since it's not currently feasible to start the server
>> without the admin service.
>>
>> Deferring initialization of the AdminService (this is far, far more
>> than the admin port) is not currently possible for a variety of
>> dependencies.
>
> Perhaps adminapp loading can be deferred. Does directory deployment
> use HTTP/RMI connector? Tools use directory deployment. So, most of
> the time
> they may not need admin app, if directory deployment doesnt use the
> HTTP or RMI ports.
>
> - Binod.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>