Hi,
Lloyd L Chambers wrote:
> Jeanfrancois,
>
> If this is "TCP Port Unification", then why is the property named
> "proxied_protocols"? Perhaps the name should reflect the goal, not the
> implmentation.
For now since the mechanism is enabled via an http-listener (for 9.1),
the proxied_protocols is really what it means. For 9.2, a new element
will be added to domain.dtd and at that time Port Unification will be
the right name.
>
> Also, could we please not invent a new naming convention? Nothing else
> in domain.xml uses an underscore. Most things use camel case, and one
> uses a dash "-" character. Others use a "." when there are multiple
> properties.
Agreed.
--Jeanfrancois
>
> Examples:
>
> <property name="PortNumber" value="1527"/>
> <property name="Password" value="APP"/>
> <property name="User" value="APP"/>
> <property name="serverName" value="localhost"/>
> <property name="DatabaseName" value="sun-appserv-samples"/>
> <property name="connectionAttributes" value=";create=true"/>
>
> <property name="docroot" value="${com.sun.aas.instanceRoot}/docroot"/>
> <property name="accesslog"
> value="${com.sun.aas.instanceRoot}/logs/access"/>enabled="true"/>
> <property name="client-hostname" value="MB.local"/></jmx-connector>
> <property name="file"
> value="${com.sun.aas.instanceRoot}/config/admin-keyfile"/>
> <property name="jaas-context" value="fileRealm"/>
> <property name="repository"
> value="${com.sun.aas.instanceRoot}/generated/policy"/>
> <property name="auditOn" value="false"/>
>
> <property name="encryption.key.alias" value="s1as"/>
> <property name="signature.key.alias" value="s1as"/>
> <property name="dynamic.username.password" value="false"/>
> <property name="debug" value="false"/>
>
> On Nov 9, 2006, at 12:42 PM, Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> just an update about the TCP port unification that will soon be
>> enabled. The feature will be enabled via domain.xml the following way:
>>
>> <http-listener ... port="4848" ... security-enabled="false">
>> <property name="proxied_protocols" value="https"/>
>> </http-listener>
>>
>> <http-listener ... port="4848" ... security-enabled="true">
>> <property name="proxied_protocols" value="http"/>
>> </http-listener>
>>
>> <http-listener ... port="8080" ... security-enabled="false">
>> <property name="proxied_protocols" value="wsit"/>
>> </http-listener>
>>
>> For 9.1, only port 8080 and 4848 will use the feature. People that are
>> interested to extends the current protocols list will have to follow
>> what I've described in [1].
>>
>> Comments?
>>
>> -- Jeanfrancois
>>
>> [1]
>> http://weblogs.java.net/blog/jfarcand/archive/2006/11/one_port_to_rul.html
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>
>