Jeanfrancois,
If this is "TCP Port Unification", then why is the property named
"proxied_protocols"? Perhaps the name should reflect the goal, not
the implmentation.
Also, could we please not invent a new naming convention? Nothing
else in domain.xml uses an underscore. Most things use camel case,
and one uses a dash "-" character. Others use a "." when there are
multiple properties.
Examples:
<property name="PortNumber" value="1527"/>
<property name="Password" value="APP"/>
<property name="User" value="APP"/>
<property name="serverName" value="localhost"/>
<property name="DatabaseName" value="sun-appserv-samples"/>
<property name="connectionAttributes" value=";create=true"/>
<property name="docroot" value="${com.sun.aas.instanceRoot}/docroot"/>
<property name="accesslog" value="${com.sun.aas.instanceRoot}/logs/
access"/>enabled="true"/>
<property name="client-hostname" value="MB.local"/></jmx-connector>
<property name="file" value="${com.sun.aas.instanceRoot}/config/admin-
keyfile"/>
<property name="jaas-context" value="fileRealm"/>
<property name="repository" value="${com.sun.aas.instanceRoot}/
generated/policy"/>
<property name="auditOn" value="false"/>
<property name="encryption.key.alias" value="s1as"/>
<property name="signature.key.alias" value="s1as"/>
<property name="dynamic.username.password" value="false"/>
<property name="debug" value="false"/>
On Nov 9, 2006, at 12:42 PM, Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just an update about the TCP port unification that will soon be
> enabled. The feature will be enabled via domain.xml the following way:
>
> <http-listener ... port="4848" ... security-enabled="false">
> <property name="proxied_protocols" value="https"/>
> </http-listener>
>
> <http-listener ... port="4848" ... security-enabled="true">
> <property name="proxied_protocols" value="http"/>
> </http-listener>
>
> <http-listener ... port="8080" ... security-enabled="false">
> <property name="proxied_protocols" value="wsit"/>
> </http-listener>
>
> For 9.1, only port 8080 and 4848 will use the feature. People that
> are interested to extends the current protocols list will have to
> follow what I've described in [1].
>
> Comments?
>
> -- Jeanfrancois
>
> [1] http://weblogs.java.net/blog/jfarcand/archive/2006/11/
> one_port_to_rul.html
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>