dev@glassfish.java.net

Re: Module directory is locked and cant be deleted: {1}

From: Roger I Martin PhD <hypernexdev_at_hypernexinc.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 17:42:51 -0400

Tim Quinn wrote:
> Hi, Roger.
>
> Thanks for following up on this.
>
> Roger I Martin PhD wrote:
>> Hi Tim & Byron,
>>
>> The handle.exe did confirm it was the glassfish JVM which was hanging
>> on to batik-all-1.5.1.jar.
>> The JVM I'm running is jdk-6-beta-windows-i586. I could test it with
>> jdk 1.5 if useful.
>>
>> I changed a test case to using Batik 1.6 and the problem went away.
>> Are you still interested in the test case with batik-all-1.5.1.jar
>> which stays locked?
> Thanks for the offer. Realistically, we probably would not have a
> chance to investigate it much because it does not seem to be -
> directly - a GlassFish problem.
>
> Will you be able to proceed with Batik 1.6, now that you've discovered
> that the later release does not trigger the problem?
I'm proceeding fine with 1.6. I use 1.6 for most things and have no
reason for this webapp to stay with 1.5. I'm mostly interested in
applying jsf 1.2 and the unified EL right now. Thanks.
>
> We continue to look for ways that GlassFish could tolerate these
> situations better. Even though this type of problem is not of
> GlassFish's making, we realize it's a real hardship for users.
>
> - Tim
>>
>> Note: Batik seems internally dependent on xalan.jar even though the
>> parser is chosen to be the jdk's internal xerces(not from xalan.jar
>> of course).
>> ...
>> org.apache.batik.dom.svg.SAXSVGDocumentFactory svgFactory=new
>> org.apache.batik.dom.svg.SAXSVGDocumentFactory("com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.SAXParser");
>> org.apache.batik.dom.svg.SVGDOMImplementation
>> svgDOMImplementation=new org.apache.batik.dom.svg.SVGDOMImplementation();
>> ...
>> although not completely confirmed. (Not a glassfish or jsf issue)
>>
>> Btw, I do get a good reaction when I show Grizzly is runnning. Your
>> names for things appeals to people.
>>
>> -Roger
>>
>> Tim Quinn wrote:
>>> Hi, Byron.
>>>
>>> Definitely. I'm actually going to write a short blog very soon
>>> about my process for diagnosing locked jars on Windows and I'll put
>>> a link to the hack jar there. I'll also describe the set-up to get
>>> the app server to use it instead of the normal one.
>>>
>>> - Tim
>>>
>>> Byron Nevins wrote:
>>>> Tim,
>>>> Can I have a copy of this hack jarfile? Also, exactly how does
>>>> one get the hacked jar to override the JVM files?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>