From: Sanjeeb Kumar Sahoo <Sanjeeb.Sahoo_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 10:17:04 +0530

Is *_at_see Foo#bar(Class) *not enough? Why do you need to specify
Class<T>? After all Foo can only have one of the two methods:
bar(Class<T>) and bar(Class), not both.

Thanks,
Sahoo
Marina Vatkina wrote:

> Team,
>
> How would I reference in javadoc (e.g. @see) a method that uses Class<T>
> as an argument (without dropping argument all together)?
>
> "<T>" causes the following 3 warnings:
>
> [javadoc] ... warning - Tag @see:illegal character: "60" in
> Foo#bar(Class<t>)"
> [javadoc] ... warning - Tag @see:illegal character: "62" in
> Foo#bar(Class<t>)"
> [javadoc] ... warning - Tag @see: can't find bar(Class<t>) in Foo
>
> I tried "&lt;T&gt;" but got even more warnings :(.
>
> Please help.
>
> thanks,
> -marina
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>