>>>>> On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 17:07:46 -0700, Ed Burns <ed.burns_at_sun.com> said:
EB> Ken Paulsen wrote:
KP> You may want to consider simplifying the API by having "ELException"
KP> utilize the ELUtil class. Then you could just pass in the key:
KP> "setPropertyFailed" and the object[].
KP>
KP> Also, I would think developers may want to customize these messages.
KP> Do you have a mechanism for doing this? Perhaps a ResourceBundleFactory?
>>>>> On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 18:24:24 -0500, Jacob Hookom <jacob_at_hookom.net> said:
JH> I would keep it simple, ELException is public so unless you make ELUtil
JH> public too, I wouldn't extend that dependency. And I don't recommend
JH> making ELUtil public.
EB> Yes, ELUtil was intended to be an impl private class. I definately
EB> don't want to make it public. I'd leave the message customizing to the
EB> layer on top of EL, in this case JSP or JSF.
After getting approval from the webtier EG, I am ready to check this
in. Can Kin-Man please review the EL portions of the version 2
change-bundle attached to this bug?
https://javaserverfaces.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=167
Thanks,
Ed
--
| ed.burns_at_sun.com | {home: 407 869 9587, office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640}
| homepage: | http://purl.oclc.org/NET/edburns/
| aim: edburns0sunw | iim: ed.burns_at_sun.com