Bill Shannon wrote on 08/03/09 17:35:
> Second, should we generalize this approach and allow it to be used
> for normally remote commands as well? This means you could create a
> domain with a non-default admin user and in the local case you would
> never need to specify the admin user name or password, and yet there
> would be some protection against remote admin access.
Kedar pointed out that this would only really work for commands that
take a domain-name argument. I don't really want to add a domain-name
argument to all remote commands as another way of specifying the target
server.