I would hope that the information you provided below would either make
it's way into the one-pager or into a document that is referenced by the
one-pager, if these are common practices for the entire QA group.
I hope that someone within the QA team is doing i18n/l10n testing.
Thanks.
Tom
On 7/28/2010 11:47 AM, Elena Asarina wrote:
> Hello Tom,
>
> Thank you very much for the feedback.
> Please see the answers bellow:
> 1) When I will complete the automation, I'm planning to execute the
> tests on all machines that we have under hudson, but at least one
> Windows, one Linux, one Solaris and for sure OEL (because I saw how
> many problem had HA in memory on that machine).
> 2) This will be only a functional testing.
> 3) I'm not planning to include any I10n tests, if you want me to
> include any I10n tests please let me know.
> 4) The automation will be done using perl. I'm running the tests in a
> configuration of two machines, two clusters, four instances. I.e. the
> script is connecting with remote machines using SSH. So far I've
> automated about a half of the testcases. When I will complete the
> automation, the tests will be executed under hudson.
> I want to mention that I've automated already, I would say, a
> functional part of INFRA requirements. I.e. execute all commands (from
> the list that was provided on the meeting), check that commands were
> executed really (not only reported success or failure) and gave the
> expected results.
> I hope that when Shaline will be back, she will check the help of the
> commands, check that all options of all commands can be executed and
> so on.
> 5) I've excluded SYNC-008 because Alex reviewed my one pager and wrote:
>
> "Please revise your one pager to include SYNC-008 to the "will not do"
> list and also
> remove SYNC-008, SYNC-009 from the Project availability section."
>
> 6) I think, that I've answered already on the question of multiple
> servers, in short - two machines.
>
> I want to write a real test plan that will include these topics and
> other topics.
>
> Yesterday Alex asked to collect the approvals of one pagers by next
> Tuesday.
> Do you want me to change anything in one pager , i.e. in a document
> that is written using a one pager template.
>
> Thank you,
> Elena
>
>
>
> Tom Mueller wrote:
>> Elena,
>>
>> Please consider these comments on the testing one-pager.
>>
>> 1. If this one pager is not going to cover everything covered in the
>> clustering one pager, please include references to the other
>> documents that do.
>>
>> 2. There is some general information about testing strategy that I
>> would expect to either be here or referenced (if it is common to all
>> one-pagers). For example:
>> - What is the strategy for testing multiple host types (OS, CPU)?
>> - Is this just functionality testing, or does it also include
>> capacity, performance, etc. testing?
>> - What about l10n testing for this functionality?
>> - What is the automation framework being used?
>>
>> 3. Why is SYNC-008 out of scope?
>>
>> 4. What is the plan for using multiple servers to do the testing?
>>
>> Thanks.
>> Tom
>>
>>
>> On 7/27/2010 5:59 PM, Elena Asarina wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Please review Clustering Infrastructure (Syncronization, Dynamic
>>> reconfiguration) testing one pager:
>>>
>>> http://agni-1.sfbay.sun.com/net/asqe-logs/export1/v3.1/docs/sqe//ClusteringInfrastructure_one_pager.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Elena
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: admin-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: admin-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>