Tim Quinn wrote on 04/30/2010 06:45 PM:
>
> On Apr 30, 2010, at 6:18 PM, Bill Shannon wrote:
>
>> Tim Quinn wrote on 04/30/10 03:59 PM:
>>> Understood. I hope that the implementation for the sync-at-restart-only
>>> approach we're adopting for now be designed at the app-at-an-instance
>>> granularity to enable easy (well, easier) addition of the other features
>>> later.
>>
>> What does "app-at-an-instance" mean?
> Very bad shorthand for organizing the code so on the DAS (sending) end
> and the instance (receiving) end to make it easy to add the feature by
> which an administrator could trigger a resync of an application on an
> instance.
An issue with the current design is that the synchronization is
triggered on the instance, and is done by the asadmin command,
not by the running instance, which would make it harder to
reuse as you suggest.