Jerome Dochez wrote on 04/07/2010 07:04 PM:
>> Of course it can be done, but we're trying to understand why it's so
>> difficult to copy xml elements such that we should consider a different
>> and less compatible approach.
>>
> the compatible approach is not copy and keep the default-config.xml
> separated. Am I misunderstanding something here ?
Yes, that would be *in*compatible.
The compatible approach is to keep default-config in domain.xml and
copy it, like v2 did.