Kedar,
Regarding CLI, I am thinking forward to a day when we have a CLI that
can generically deal with all MBeans via pathnames.
As you know, I feel that explicit (hard-coded) commands have their
place, but are not a substitute for a CLI that generically supports
all objects in the system without the need to invent new commands.
Indeed generic support can be easier to use on the whole, as it
leverages one common idiom.
Lloyd
On Mar 24, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Kedar Mhaswade wrote:
>
>
> Lloyd Chambers wrote:
>> Pathnames proposal for V3, intended for use in URLs and admin CLI
>> is now a separate doc:
>> https://glassfish.dev.java.net/nonav/v3/admin/planning/V3Changes/V3_Pathnames.html
>
> Thanks Lloyd. I will read it carefully.
>
> I understand "for use in URLs".
>
> Can you explain what you mean by " for use in admin CLI"? I don't
> think set/get/list of "dotted names" is going anywhere. So, how
> is admin CLI going to utilize the path names? Are you proposing
> new asadmin commands?
>
> -Kedar
>
>> Lloyd Chambers
>> lloyd.chambers_at_sun.com
>> GlassFish Team
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: admin-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: admin-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: admin-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: admin-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>
Lloyd Chambers
lloyd.chambers_at_sun.com
GlassFish Team