Bill Shannon wrote:
> Kedar Mhaswade wrote:
>> I was thinking specifically in terms of --target as that specifies
>> a remote server instance or a cluster which might be accessed depending
>> upon the value. Since the only target available for Prelude is the
>> only server (call it DAS or whatever), I thought we can safely remove
>> that for now rather than accept a value for it and then ignore it.
>> If it's too much of work, let's not to do it. It was just a thought.
>
> Even though there's no way to create new targets, seems like we could
> still accept --target and verify that its argument matches one of the
> predefined targets. Compatibility-wise, that seems safest for Prelude.
That can be done. So, if someone did "asadmin <cmd> --target xyz ...", s/he
gets "invalid target: xyz" and the command fails, right?
I was hoping to avoid those efforts, for now ;)
-Kedar