admin@glassfish.java.net

Re: Action items for Kedar from today's

From: Bill Shannon <bill.shannon_at_sun.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:09:30 -0700

Kedar Mhaswade wrote:
> I was thinking specifically in terms of --target as that specifies
> a remote server instance or a cluster which might be accessed depending
> upon the value. Since the only target available for Prelude is the
> only server (call it DAS or whatever), I thought we can safely remove
> that for now rather than accept a value for it and then ignore it.
> If it's too much of work, let's not to do it. It was just a thought.

Even though there's no way to create new targets, seems like we could
still accept --target and verify that its argument matches one of the
predefined targets. Compatibility-wise, that seems safest for Prelude.