Lloyd L Chambers wrote:
> String is used almost everywhere, with the prominent exception of fairly
> widespread use of 'boolean'. Arguably such booleans are unlikely to
> vary across a <config> though, so the problem generally does not assert
> itself.
The way boolean attributes are defined in the DTD, it doesn't seem like
you can use a property reference in the attribute value. They're defined
using the "boolean" entity, rather than as CDATA. That might be a bug,
or a missing feature, that these attributes can't vary from server to
server based on a property, unlike string valued attributes.
> Actually, I'm quite surprised, I thought we had 'int' in a number of
> places. For 9.1, everything went in as a String, and maybe 9.0
> corrected most of the 'int' cases to String. So I'm pleasantly
> surprised that we have much less of an issue than I thought!
Great!