Mark,
Yes, this is customer escalation. Today they need a fix for AS 8.1 but
I think it would be a good idea to include this fix in 9.1 as well to
avoid regression.
Thanks,
/Oleg
Mark A. Basler wrote:
> HI Guys,
>
> If this is a customer escalation, by definition it should go into the
> UR1 release unless there is a good reason why it shouldn't.
>
> FYI....
>
> Thanks - Mark
>
>
> Kedar Mhaswade wrote:
>
>> Finally, I have been able to fix this problem (reasonably).
>>
>> All about it can be found at:
>> http://wiki.glassfish.java.net/attach/GlassFishAdminReferences/6505045.html
>>
>>
>> Please go through the background and code changes if you have time
>> and let me
>> know if you have any comments, by tomorrow 12.00 noon, pacific.
>>
>> I am planning to check this in then, on GlassFish trunk.
>>
>> Mark Basler: I leave it up to you to approve the fix for 9.1 UR1. If
>> you do
>> want to do that, let me know and I can port the changes there.
>>
>> I have run the tests on my 128M Zip-drive on Mac OS X by observing
>> domain.xml go
>> to zero-bytes and domain.xml.protect coming to rescue, making every
>> attempt
>> to persist the domain.xml.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Kedar
>