admin@glassfish.java.net

Re: Code Review: Bug fix for: 6505045 ...

From: Mark A. Basler <Mark.Basler_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:07:59 -0700

HI Guys,

If this is a customer escalation, by definition it should go into the
UR1 release unless there is a good reason why it shouldn't.

FYI....

Thanks - Mark


Kedar Mhaswade wrote:
> Finally, I have been able to fix this problem (reasonably).
>
> All about it can be found at:
> http://wiki.glassfish.java.net/attach/GlassFishAdminReferences/6505045.html
>
>
> Please go through the background and code changes if you have time and
> let me
> know if you have any comments, by tomorrow 12.00 noon, pacific.
>
> I am planning to check this in then, on GlassFish trunk.
>
> Mark Basler: I leave it up to you to approve the fix for 9.1 UR1. If
> you do
> want to do that, let me know and I can port the changes there.
>
> I have run the tests on my 128M Zip-drive on Mac OS X by observing
> domain.xml go
> to zero-bytes and domain.xml.protect coming to rescue, making every
> attempt
> to persist the domain.xml.
>
> Regards,
> Kedar