users@fi.java.net

Re: Difference betweenJWSDP FastInfoSet.jar and fi.dev.java.net stable release

From: Tony Seebregts <tonys_at_cibecs.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:12:49 +0200

Hi Paul,

The product is still under development/wraps so I can't say all that
much about it :-(.

But basically, I'm using FI to stream documents accompanied by
structured metadata that describes the content/routing/disposition of
the document. Not rocket science stuff and the initial requirements were
simple enough to just use HTTP headers and binary content. But
(inevitably) the requirements changed and grew and eventually I switched
to XML (with the document content encoded using base 64) to streamline
the code a bit and build in some future-proofing.

The performance was pretty horrible though and I was *just* about to
write a binary encoded XML mechanism when I came across your Fast
Infoset stuff - which did *exactly* what I needed and saved a whole
bunch of development and testing. It worked first time too <smile>!

Performance-wise its pretty acceptable too - in fact the real
application testing I've done says any drop in performance is pretty
much lost in the noise of the rest of the processing. So ... lots of
happiness this side :-) !

regards

Tony


Paul Sandoz wrote:

> Hi Tony,
>
> If you can talk publically can you describe a bit about what you are
> using FI for and how it solved your problem.
>
> We are always interested in how FI is being used, and i am very keen
> to blog about it here [1], if you have no objections :-)
>
> Paul.
>
> [1] http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/sandoz
>
>