Paul Sandoz wrote:
>
>>>>I'm also going to prototype a BYTE encoder for possible native
>>>>inclusion into FI.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>OK. We need to standardize the URI for this algorithm. Will this be
>>>included in the X3D algorithms?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>I feel its more general then that. But I'm also happy to have X3D get a
>>little more publicity by having this in its namespace. Your call.
>>
>>
>>
>
>I agree with you that it is a 'horizontal' algorithm.
>
>If we cannot get this added to the first revision of the standard it
>will have to get added as an amendment, which will take time so getting
>it standardized through X3D might be quicker.
>
>
>
>
ok. I'll namespace to X3D and work from there. Just about ready to
implement this one. Got caught up in doing time trials, got the parsing
for the CAD file to 7.25 times faster now... wonder when I should stop :)