I uploaded the file with diffs if it's of any help:
http://java.net/projects/interceptors-spec/downloads/download/interceptor-1-2-dr1-diff.pdf
-marina
On 2/1/13 1:31 PM, Marina Vatkina wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> It was a lot of work ;). I can create a diff from the original+ (i.e.
> the version that Linda created in the framemaker from 1.1), but it
> will also show a lot of changes, not the changes for a specific sentence.
>
> -marina
>
> On 2/1/13 1:16 PM, Jeremy Bauer wrote:
>> Hi Marina,
>>
>> The change bars cover nearly the entire document, making it difficult
>> to target the updated sections. If possible, can you provide a
>> document with more accurate change bars?
>>
>> -Jeremy
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Marina Vatkina <marina.vatkina_at_oracle.com>
>> To: jsr345-experts_at_ejb-spec.java.net, Pete Muir <pmuir_at_redhat.com>,
>> Date: 01/29/2013 04:07 PM
>> Subject: [jsr345-experts] Interceptors spec 1.2 draft is available
>> for review
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> After a lot of work by Linda, me, and Pete, we have the Interceptors
>> spec 1.2 draft for review:
>> http://java.net/projects/interceptors-spec/downloads/download/interceptor-1-2-dr1.pdf
>>
>> What's there:
>> Editorial cleanup and conversion to standard template.
>> Assigned chapter numbers to sections and rearranged various sections and
>> examples for better flow.
>> Clarified statement regarding transaction context of lifecycle callback
>> methods
>> Added a note on a timeout method that is also a business method and
>> around-timeout and around-invoke interceptors
>> Added Chapter 1 (Overview)
>> Added Chapter 3, derived from Chapter 9 of the CDI specification.
>> Removed deployment descriptors definitions (general notes about
>> possibility of DDs are there)
>> Added examples with interceptor bindings to common sections.
>> Added standard Priority ranges
>>
>> What's not there:
>> @AroundConstruct interceptor
>> Notes on "throws Exception" clauses in the around-xxx method signatures
>> Perfect CDI alignment - the text (and fonts) might be not fully aligned.
>>
>> Please review ASAP.
>>
>> Pete, please forward to the CDI EG.
>>
>> thanks,
>> -marina
>>
>>
>