[XXX Should this be “must act”?]
I would say "should act". It doesn't need to be mandatory.
[XXX Should this be “must be the name”?]
Yes.
Carlo
On 07/06/2011 01:02 AM, Marina Vatkina wrote:
> Dear Experts,
>
> Before we go any further on the discussions of the spec improvements,
> we need to close on several issues with the current version:
>
> 1. Vote on the optionality of the Entity Beans and JAX-RPC based Web
> Service Endpoints (and the split of the spec into 2 parts, but the
> split is the secondary issue). I have only 3 votes (positive) so far.
>
> 2. Close on the items marked by Linda as XXX in the drafts.
>
> 3. Define *deterministic* rules in the EJB spec about EJB Lite vs. EJB
> Full list of features in regards to the EJB support in a Web Profile
> container. In addition to be very flexible (contrary to the regular
> Java EE approach, and the expectations of the EJB TCK), the current
> wording in the spec does not make it clear a) what is expected and
> what is not in the Web Profile, and b) if we keep it flexible, how a
> user (at deployment and/or runtime) can determine if a specific
> feature outside EJB Lite is available/supported.
>
> The same applies to the Embeddable EJB Container.
>
> Thank you,
> -marina
>
>