I agree.
On 6/30/2011 5:36 AM, Stefan Heldt wrote:
> Ok, hopefully java.net is up now.
>
> And of course: I would vote for a) and marking all other EJB 2.1 things as proposed OPTIONAL in 3.2.
>
> Stefan!
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Marina Vatkina [mailto:marina.vatkina_at_oracle.com]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. Juni 2011 23:42
> An: Stefan Heldt
> Betreff: Re: AW: [jsr345-experts] Re: Working draft documents are available for review
>
> Hi Stefan,
>
> As proposed optional :).
>
> You might need to resend your reply, if it is not delivered to the aliases when java.net is back up.
>
> thanks,
> -marina
>
> Stefan Heldt wrote:
>> I would vote for a) and marking all other EJB 2.1 things as proposed final in 3.2.
>>
>> Stefan!
>>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Marina Vatkina [mailto:marina.vatkina_at_oracle.com]
>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. Juni 2011 02:34
>> An: jsr345-experts_at_ejb-spec.java.net
>> Betreff: [jsr345-experts] Re: Working draft documents are available
>> for review
>>
>> We have 2 choices:
>>
>> a) make optional in this release features that were defined as
>> proposed optional in 3.1;
>> b) make them optional in the next release (or later) when we have more features that reach this option.
>>
>> What would be your preference?
>>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1388 / Virus Database: 1516/3734 - Release Date: 06/29/11
>
>
>